| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
dereliction of duty |
disrespectful attitude |
|
Summary:
The claimant filed a benefit claim after being dismissed by his employer. The Commission determined that the claimant was dismissed because of his misconduct. The employer complained that the claimant behaved so aggressively towards other employees that the claimant had to ensure that the claimant took his lunch break at a different time than the other employees. The employer also described the claimant's disrespectful attitude towards the residents of the residence where he worked. The employer had received complaints from the residents. The employer gave the claimant many verbal warnings. The BOR reviewed the evidence and found that the evidence of misconduct was established. The appeal by the claimant is dismissed by the Umpire.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
unacceptable behavior |
aggressively towards |
|
Summary:
The claimant filed a benefit claim after being dismissed by his employer. The Commission determined that the claimant was dismissed because of his misconduct. The employer complained that the claimant behaved so aggressively towards other employees that the claimant had to ensure that the claimant took his lunch break at a different time than the other employees. The employer also described the claimant's disrespectful attitude towards the residents of the residence where he worked. The employer had received complaints from the residents. The employer gave the claimant many verbal warnings. The BOR reviewed the evidence and found that the evidence of misconduct was established. The appeal by the claimant is dismissed by the Umpire.
