| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
harassment |
|
|
Summary:
On February 6, 2009 the claimant lost his employment due to misconduct. The claimant attest, and, in a letter reveals his distress, he describes the events that led to his dismissal. It is alleged that the claimant made harassing telephone to a co-worker. The claimant acknowledged the fact but argued that it was outside his hours of work. The Commission determined that those actions, even outside working hours, constitute acts of misconduct. The employer added "that it could not keep the claimant in his job because of the restrictions imposed, since both individuals worked in the same office. The appeal by the claimant is dismissed.
