| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| parental benefits |
for the purpose of adoption |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission determined that the claimant was not available for work due to her obligation to care for her grandson as ordered by the Court, a disentitlement was imposed. The claimant later indicated that she wanted to apply for parental benefits. The Commission determined that the claimant was not eligible for parental benefits because it was established without ambiguous that the care of a child by order of a Court is not equivalent to a placement for the purpose of adoption. The Commission's appeal is allowed.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
incompatible situations |
family obligations |
|
Summary:
The Commission determined that the claimant was not available for work due to her obligation to care for her grandson as ordered by the Court, a disentitlement was imposed. The claimant later indicated that she wanted to apply for parental benefits. The Commission determined that the claimant was not eligible for parental benefits because it was established without ambiguous that the care of a child by order of a Court is not equivalent to a placement for the purpose of adoption. The Commission's appeal is allowed.
