| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
breach of rules |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant was fired for misconduct because she allegedly allowed her common-law partner, to enter the residence. The claimant allowed her spouse to provide personal hygiene care to female clients, who became very uncomfortable when they saw the stranger. Numerous complaints were later filed and the claimant was dismissed. In a very well set-out decision, the Board of Referees concluded that the claimant was aware of the employer's legitimate and reasonable guidelines. For these reasons, the claimant's appeal was dismissed by the Umpire.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
insubordination |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant was fired for misconduct because she allegedly allowed her common-law partner, to enter the residence. The claimant allowed her spouse to provide personal hygiene care to female clients, who became very uncomfortable when they saw the stranger. Numerous complaints were later filed and the claimant was dismissed. In a very well set-out decision, the Board of Referees concluded that the claimant was aware of the employer's legitimate and reasonable guidelines. For these reasons, the claimant's appeal was dismissed by the Umpire.
