Decision 72264

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 72264   Maximilien Polak  English 2009-03-18
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed  No Commission  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
reconsideration of claim  overpayment  claimant's liability 

Summary:

The claimant filed an initial benefit claim, effective February 20, 2005, after he stopped working for a granite company. He then worked for the same employer during the weeks of March 7 to September 4, 2005 and the week of January 29, 2006. An investigation showed that he did not report his earnings from employment while he was receiving benefits. The claimant indicated that he suspected his ex-partner of making false representations without his knowledge and that he was innocent. The claimant had opened a joint account with a woman; two debit cards were issued so she could carry out transactions in the joint account under the claimant's signature. The woman denied everything and said that she did not have an ATM card and the claimant never gave her his access code and never asked her to complete his reports. The claimant was the victim of his ex-partner's actions. The Commission's appeal is allowed.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
reconsideration of claim  proof  credibility 

Summary:

The claimant filed an initial benefit claim, effective February 20, 2005, after he stopped working for a granite company. He then worked for the same employer during the weeks of March 7 to September 4, 2005 and the week of January 29, 2006. An investigation showed that he did not report his earnings from employment while he was receiving benefits. The claimant indicated that he suspected his ex-partner of making false representations without his knowledge and that he was innocent. The claimant had opened a joint account with a woman; two debit cards were issued so she could carry out transactions in the joint account under the claimant's signature. The woman denied everything and said that she did not have an ATM card and the claimant never gave her his access code and never asked her to complete his reports. The claimant was the victim of his ex-partner's actions. The Commission's appeal is allowed.


Date modified: