| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
improper language |
|
|
Summary:
Ms. X was employed by a company owned or operated by her sister and brother-in-law. She was dismissed following a verbal confrontation between her on the one hand, her sister and brother-in-law on the other. Ms. X admits she swore and used foul language. Information from the employer was to the effect that Ms. X had problems working with a co-employee. Employer states that what was supposed to be a constructive meeting to solve a problem with the claimant escalated into a verbal "attack and a lot of terrible comments". Claimant was verbally warned that her language and swearing would not be tolerated and the meeting disintegrated in to a personal shouting match between the 2 sisters. Claimant was dismissed at that time. The appeal by the claimant is dismissed.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
personal convictions |
|
|
Summary:
Ms. X was employed by a company owned or operated by her sister and brother-in-law. She was dismissed following a verbal confrontation between her on the one hand, her sister and brother-in-law on the other. Ms. X admits she swore and used foul language. Information from the employer was to the effect that Ms. X had problems working with a co-employee. Employer states that what was supposed to be a constructive meeting to solve a problem with the claimant escalated into a verbal "attack and a lot of terrible comments". Claimant was verbally warned that her language and swearing would not be tolerated and the meeting disintegrated in to a personal shouting match between the 2 sisters. Claimant was dismissed at that time. The appeal by the claimant is dismissed.
