| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
in several respects |
|
Summary:
The claimant quitted her job because her husband, a seasonal worker, was returning to work and she had to take a leave of absence to care for a special needs child. She had a very difficult situation with her child who had numerous instances of unacceptable behaviour. Even though she had just cause to quit her job under section 29(c) of the Act, it was still necessary for her to show that she was available for work during the period as that is a requirement to receive benefits under section 18(a) of the Act. According to the Umpire, the decision of the BOR is in conformity with the evidence and in conformity with the law. Even though there appears to be a conflict between section 29 and section 18 of the Act, there is a definite distinction. Section 29 provides for just cause for leaving your employment. Even though you have just cause for leaving your employment, in order to collect benefits you still have to show availability under section 18 of the Act.
