| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
number of hours required |
violation |
|
Summary:
The uncontested evidence established that the claimant had to be considered a claimant who was a new entrant or re-entrant to the labour force and he had accumulated a minor violation. He therefore required 1,050 hours to establish a claim and he had only accumulated 910 hours of employment in his qualifying period. The Board erred in law in applying subsection 7.1(1) of the Act to the claimant's situation when it was subsection 7.1(2) of the Act that applied. See similar case, CUB 67760.
