Decision 67847
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 67847 | Riche David G. | English | 2007-03-02 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | Commission | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| voluntarily leaving employment | just cause | obligation to care for a child |
Summary:
What the Board meant to do was to refer to s. 29(c)(v), which is the obligation to care for a member of your immediate family. Unfortunately, however, a grandchild is not considered to be immediate family and their conclusion was in error.