Decision 66035

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 66035   Rouleau  English 2006-10-23
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed  No Commission  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
earnings  vacation pay  specific period 

Summary:

The Commission correctly allocated the two weeks vacation pay the claimant actually took to the periods of scheduled vacation in accordance with Regulation 36(8)(a). The balance of the vacation pay for the four weeks which the claimant had not taken, was allocated pursuant to Regulation 36(8)(b). The effect of paragraph 36(8)(b) is that vacation pay which is not payable for a specific vacation period is to be allocated to the number of weeks starting with the first week for which it is payable.


Date modified: