| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
harassment |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant dismissed after repeated sexual harassment incidents. Due to the parties’ contradictory versions, BOR gives claimant benefit of the doubt. BOR erred in fact according to the Umpire. Following an investigation which seriousness and breadth are not disputed, le claimant offers no evidence disproving the incidents described, except for denying they occurred. The BOR could have rejected the evidence but would have had to justify such rejection. Commission’s appeal allowed.
