| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
just cause |
significant change in salary |
|
Summary:
Claimant argued that a reduction of his working hours from 60 hours and more to 40 hours per week was a significant change in working conditions and that this constituted constructive dismissal. Held by Umpire that the claimant had the alternative of keeping his employment. A prudent person would not have left a job providing a normal number of hours at a salary that was not negligible for no employment at all.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
working conditions |
hours |
|
Summary:
Claimant argued that a reduction of his working hours from 60 hours and more to 40 hours per week was a significant change in working conditions and that this constituted constructive dismissal. Held by Umpire that the claimant had the alternative of keeping his employment. A prudent person would not have left a job providing a normal number of hours at a salary that was not negligible for no employment at all.
