| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
knowingly |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant convinced that she did not have to report earnings from her part-time job and thought that the questions on the cards were addressing only full-time work. Argument dismissed by Umpire. It is difficult to fathom that one could believe that she could receive full employment insurance benefits and still receive such earnings from work, part-time or otherwise. The purpose of these questions is too obvious for one to arrive at such an understanding.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
clear and simple language |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant convinced that she did not have to report earnings from her part-time job and thought that the questions on the cards were addressing only full-time work. Argument dismissed by Umpire. It is difficult to fathom that one could believe that she could receive full employment insurance benefits and still receive such earnings from work, part-time or otherwise. The purpose of these questions is too obvious for one to arrive at such an understanding.
