| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
dishonesty |
|
|
Summary:
To avoid paying the 15 cents return, claimant wilfully sold beer at $3.00 instead of $2.85. He was fired. BOR did not establish misconduct because there was no theft, no criminal action, and there was no police report. False premise according to Umpire. Employee must justify any deliberate and conscious action that would prejudice the integrity of his functions.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
merit of dismissal |
|
|
Summary:
To avoid paying the 15 cents return, claimant wilfully sold beer at $3.00 instead of $2.85. He was fired. BOR did not establish misconduct because there was no theft, no criminal action, and there was no police report. False premise according to Umpire. Employee must justify any deliberate and conscious action that would prejudice the integrity of his functions.
