| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
misjudgment |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant, a correctional services officer, had developed a romantic relationship with an inmate, contrary to professional ethics. She had also been involved in drug trafficking in the institution. This was considered to be reprehensible behaviour with an inmate on the part of the claimant and, although the claimant was acquitted of the first two charges, the BOR could not ignore the last two charges of which she was found guilty.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
criminal acts |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant, a correctional services officer, had developed a romantic relationship with an inmate, contrary to professional ethics. She had also been involved in drug trafficking in the institution. This was considered to be reprehensible behaviour with an inmate on the part of the claimant and, although the claimant was acquitted of the first two charges, the BOR could not ignore the last two charges of which she was found guilty.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
alcohol, drugs and gambling |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant, a correctional services officer, had developed a romantic relationship with an inmate, contrary to professional ethics. She had also been involved in drug trafficking in the institution. This was considered to be reprehensible behaviour with an inmate on the part of the claimant and, although the claimant was acquitted of the first two charges, the BOR could not ignore the last two charges of which she was found guilty.
