Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
voluntarily leaving employment |
just cause |
other employment |
|
Summary:
Umpire found that, based on the evidence, when the claimant quit his job, he did not have "reasonable assurance of another employment in the immediate future." On the contrary, he admitted that he did not have any job prospects or promises of employment. He alleged that he was optimistic about finding a job in construction. That is not sufficient to enable a claimant to invoke paragraph 29(c)(vi) of the EIA.