| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
just cause |
other employment |
|
Summary:
BOR erred in applying a test to show lack of just cause which is more stringent than the statutory test of "reasonable assurance". Statute simply requires clmt to show that he had "reasonable assurance of another employment in the immediate future".
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
new employment |
not definite |
|
Summary:
Clmt quit after being assured that employment by the prospective employer seemed "probable". Umpire stated that the word "problable" used by the employer lends support to the claimant's reasonable assurance of another employment.
