| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
material fact |
mistake as to a |
new facts to BOR, Umpire or Commission |
Summary:
BOR allowed appeal based on an error made on the Notice of Decision which did not spelled out all the separation moneys the total represented. Umpired ruled that no material fact occurred in this case as no prejudice to clmt has been shown by what can only be termed a clerical error which carries no consequence for clmt since total amount of allocation is correct.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
earnings |
Summary:
BOR allowed appeal based on an error made on the Notice of Decision which did not spelled out all the separation moneys the total represented. Clmt is not relieved from the operation of the allocation provisions even if the Commission provides erroneous information or commits an error.
