Decision 42394
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 42394 | Joyal | French | 1998-10-20 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | Claimant | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | weight of statements | hearsay |
Summary:
Evidence of misconduct in claimant's case was limited to officer's notes from telephone conversation with employer. BOR gave preference to hearsay in taking employer's version over that of claimant. Although, hearsay may be admissible before a BOR, doctrine always gives precedence to direct testimony.