| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
damages |
|
|
Summary:
Clmt altered patient medical orders assuming the doctor had agreed to the changes and in another followed company's policy not to call doctor just to discontinue treatment. Umpire ruled that this act is not only reprehensible act but also a serious breach of the company's policy that could have had serious effects on the health of patients under her care.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
refusal to obey orders |
|
|
Summary:
Clmt altered patient medical orders assuming the doctor had agreed to the changes and in another followed company's policy not to call doctor just to discontinue treatment. Umpire ruled that this act is not only reprehensible act but also a serious breach of the company's policy that could have had serious effects on the health of patients under her care.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
misjudgment |
|
|
Summary:
Clmt altered patient medical orders assuming the doctor had agreed to the changes and in another followed company's policy not to call doctor just to discontinue treatment. Umpire ruled that this act is not only reprehensible act but also a serious breach of the company's policy that could have had serious effects on the health of patients under her care.
