| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
harassment |
|
|
Summary:
Clmt qualified his behavior towards a female employee as an error in judgement. Umpire stated that an error in judgment occurs by a person, who in the course of his duties, fails to properly balance or assess information available when having to select between two or more alternatives and in the result errs in his selection. Clmt's behavior amounted to miconduct as it was calculated, wilful, deliberate and in violation of the employer's harassment policy.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
misjudgment |
|
|
Summary:
Clmt qualified his behavior towards a female employee as an error in judgement. Umpire stated that an error in judgment occurs by a person, who in the course of his duties, fails to properly balance or assess information available when having to select between two or more alternatives and in the result errs in his selection. Clmt's behavior amounted to miconduct as it was calculated, wilful, deliberate and in violation of the employer's harassment policy.
