| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
insubordination |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant's decision to drive in disobedience of instructions to await for repairs to a tire indicates a disregard of a standard of behaviour that his employer had a right to expect of him. His conduct was incompatible with his duty to his employer to preserve his equipment and that conduct manifested misconduct.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
refusal to obey orders |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant's decision to drive in disobedience of instructions to await for repairs to a tire indicates a disregard of a standard of behaviour that his employer had a right to expect of him. His conduct was incompatible with his duty to his employer to preserve his equipment and that conduct manifested misconduct.
