Decision 40275

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 40275   Haddad  English 1998-02-09
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No Employer  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  errors in law  excess of jurisdiction 

Summary:

BOR committed an error by applying in their decision EI Act 29 (c)(iv) "any other reasonable circumstances that are prescribed". This means prescribed by regulations or determined in accordance with the rules prescribed by the regulations. It does not confer upon BOR the authority to adopt or prescribed what it considers to be other reasonable circumstances.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  errors in law  misinterpretation of provision 

Summary:

BOR committed an error by applying in their decision EI Act 29 (c)(iv) "any other reasonable circumstances that are prescribed". This means prescribed by regulations or determined in accordance with the rules prescribed by the regulations. It does not confer upon BOR the authority to adopt or prescribed what it considers to be other reasonable circumstances.


Date modified: