| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
credibility |
|
Summary:
The employer and claimant both assumed the opposite view of whether firing or dismissal took place. In the absence of evidence supporting the employer's version, the Umpire supported the BOR's decision by giving the benefit of the doubt to the claimant.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
proof |
weight of statements |
|
Summary:
In weighting competing claims regarding whether clmt left work voluntarily or was fired, Umpire, in the absence of evidence supporting the employer's version that clmt quit voluntarily, supported BOR's decision by giving the benefit of the doubt to clmt.
