| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
lateness |
|
|
Summary:
Dismissed because he constantly arrived late for work. Umpire concluded that claimant's behavior is unacceptable particularly having regard to the fact that he was given several warnings. Misconduct has been defined as a wilful and wanton disregard of his employer's interest and claimant's conduct falls within that definition. It has been well established that continued tardiness in reporting for work constitutes misconduct.
