| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
elsewhere than at work |
|
|
Summary:
Owing to his conviction and the nature of his job, which is based on a relationship of trust between the salesperson representing the company with clients, the employer was justified in taking dismissal action . Through his misconduct, he deliberately did something that would disqualify him from receiving benefits, even though his actions took place off the premises of the employer. A furniture salesperson who breaks and enters at numerous cottages and commits thefts there is not protected from the application of section 28 of the Act.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
criminal acts |
|
|
Summary:
Owing to his conviction and the nature of his job, which is based on a relationship of trust between the salesperson representing the company with clients, the employer was justified in taking dismissal action . Through his misconduct, he deliberately did something that would disqualify him from receiving benefits, even though his actions took place off the premises of the employer. A furniture salesperson who breaks and enters at numerous cottages and commits thefts there is not protected from the application of section 28 of the Act.
