| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
contradictory |
|
Summary:
Clmt’s early statements contradicted the oral evidence presented before BOR. Umpire stated that earlier statements in proper circumstance may be regarded as more credible than later contradictory statements especially where earlier and later statements are made by the same person and given after clmt became aware of the consequences.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
proof |
weight of statements |
|
Summary:
Clmt’s early statements recorded by Commission’s investigator contradicted the oral evidence presented before BOR. Umpire stated that earlier statements in proper circumstance may be regarded as more credible than later contradictory statements especially where earlier and later statements are made by the same person and given after clmt became aware of the consequences.
