| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
new employment |
temporary |
|
Summary:
Claimant left his position only after he had procured another job. Although the latter job was temporary in nature, it was clear that employment was possible for permanent positions. Umpire stated that the Commission requirement, that the alternative employment be permanent in nature, is not consistent with the intent or spirit of the Act. Claimant did precisely what was expected of him.
