Decision 38413
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 38413 | Lutfy | French | 1997-09-02 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returned to a different Board | No | Claimant | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | errors in law | statement of facts required |
Summary:
The BOR determined that the claimant had been negligent, but it seems to have immediately equated negligence with misconduct, without indicating its reasons for doing so, as required by subsection 79(2) of the Act. This omission on the part of the BOR constitutes an error justifying the quashing of its decision.