| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
jurisdiction |
evidence new |
|
Summary:
Evidence produced by claimant to Umpire would have been available well before the hearing date if he had acted expeditiously. It is well established that evidence that was available at the time of the hearing but not produced cannot be considered as a "new fact" within the meaning of S.86.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| proof |
evidence new |
amendment of decision |
|
Summary:
Evidence produced by claimant to Umpire would have been available well before the hearing date if he had acted expeditiously. It is well established that evidence that was available at the time of the hearing but not produced cannot be considered as a "new fact" within the meaning of S.86.
