| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
merit of dismissal |
|
|
Summary:
The arbitration board does not seem to have paid due attention to the serious allegations brought forward by the employer. Its decision seems based solely on the beneficiary's testimony. The arbitration board could have set aside the documentary evidence, but was obliged to explain why it had to do so.
A disruption of the mutual confidence that must reign between employer and employee is sufficient to justify dismissal for misconduct.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
without regard for material |
|
Summary:
The arbitration board does not seem to have paid due attention to the serious allegations brought forward by the employer. Its decision seems to be based solely on the beneficiary's testimony. The arbitration board could have set aside the documentary evidence, but was obliged to explain why it had to do so.
