Decision 32044
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 32044 | Haddad | English | 1996-01-22 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| voluntarily leaving employment | just cause | reasonable circumstance as prescribed |
Summary:
Reliance by the BOR on s.28(4)n) is an error in law. That provision does not confer a discretion upon the Commission to prescribe reasonable circumstances. I interpret that provision to mean such other reasonable circumstances as may be prescribed by Reg. as empowered by the U.I. Act.