Decision 29449
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 29449 | Reed | English | 1995-10-05 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| misconduct | lateness |
Summary:
During his probationary period, the claimant was dismissed for being late on numerous occasions despite being warned. Fewer incidents will justify the dismissal of a probationary employee than might be the case for a long-term employee.