| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
contract terminating with end of school year |
|
|
Summary:
Newfoundland replacement teacher with contract ending 6-92. The narrow issue in this case is "had her contract terminated?" In my view it had. The fact that 10 days later she obtained a new contract with the same employer for the next school year did not nullify that fact.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
guidelines from the Commission |
|
Summary:
Nothing on file related to the Commission's internal policy referred to by the Board. In any event, the Board and the Umpire must make their own interpretations of the facts and the legislation. Whether the Commission had conflicting internal interpretations is irrelevant. The Board erred in law.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
earnings |
summer months |
|
Summary:
In DICK, it was recognized that when a teacher's salary is paid in 12 monthly installments for 10 months of teaching, the payments relate to the work performed in the 10 months and not to the vacation months of July and August.
