| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
refusal to work overtime |
|
|
Summary:
In the absence of concrete evidence that the working of overtime was a requirement under the contract of employment (be that an oral contract or a written one), I am not prepared to conclude that a refusal to work on that Friday was a decision the claimant was not entitled to make.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
hearings |
tape-recording |
|
Summary:
Board's decision partly based on a statement that claimant categorically denies having made at the hearing. In the absence of a tape, he cannot have the oral evidence reviewed to verify his position. As in CUB 26426, this vitiates the possibility of a fair hearing of this appeal.
