Decision 29168
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 29168 | Reed | English | 1995-09-27 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Returned to a different Board | No | N/A | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
earnings | allocation | by reason of separation |
Summary:
KINKEAD explained. If the 1990 vacation pay was not paid because of the employer's poor payment practices and the payment in 11-91 was merely made "on the occasion of" the separation from employment, rather than by reason of it, then those amounts should not be allocated as earnings.