Decision 28825
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 28825 | Nadon | English | 1995-08-28 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| voluntarily leaving employment | just cause | obligation to care for a child |
Summary:
Left when, due to legislative changes, she lost her subsidized childcare (4 children aged 1 to 6). Held by the Board that 28(4)(e) did not apply as she did not meet the test of no reasonable alternative in that she did not ask her employer for a leave to seek alternative childcare. No error in law.