| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
awards |
nature of monies |
|
Summary:
Held that the settlement was not grounded in the employment relation and did not arise out of it. It was related to the loss of a house, loss of a job prospect and slanderous and defamatory remarks made after dimissal. As a consequence, the monies were not earnings for UI purposes.
Slanderous statements made by several officers of the employer after dismissal. No attempt was made by the parties to deny this, so claimant's evidence in this connection should have been accepted and given full weight. The documents provided tend to corroborate his version, at least by implication.
