Decision 27838
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 27838 | Rouleau | English | 1995-06-06 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| basic concepts | qualifying period | extension | jury |
Summary:
Held that the Board did not err in law in concluding that "other similar institution" includes claimant's binding obligation by law to accept jury duty. The reasoning in XUAN applies here. It would be contrary to public policy to deny an extension in such cases.