| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
absences from work |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant's continued lateness after receiving a memo and her absence from work on 14-11-91, without apparent excuse and after having received 2 verbal warnings are more than sufficient to constitute reckless conduct, thereby satisfying the mens rea requirements for misconduct as per TUCKER.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
lateness |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant's continued lateness after receiving the memo and her absence from work on 14-11-91, without apparent excuse and after having received 2 verbal warnings are more than sufficient to constitute reckless conduct, thereby satisfying the mens rea requirements for misconduct as per TUCKER.
