| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
definition |
|
|
Summary:
No-smoking rule violated in hazardous area. Claimant is an addict. The Board held that by habit he found himself smoking in a non-smoking area. Although this decision is not explicit, I read it as implying a finding that he did not wilfully violate the rule. Element of wilfullness not present.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
alcohol, drugs and gambling |
|
|
Summary:
No-smoking rule violated in hazardous area. Claimant is an addict. The Board held that by habit he found himself smoking in a non-smoking area. Although this decision is not explicit, I read it as implying a finding that he did not wilfully violate the rule. Element of wilfullness not present.
