Decision 27486
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 27486 | Haddad | English | 1995-04-21 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | Yes | Claimant | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | wage-loss indemnity | group plan |
Summary:
An indemnity plan can be considered a group plan only if it can satisfy each of the conditions contained in ss. 57(4). In this case the 2 conditions (b) and (c) have not been met. The plan therefore is not a group plan. The Board erred. [NOTE that this reasoning does not harmonize with case law]