| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
merit of dismissal |
|
|
Summary:
After having been warned on 2 previous occasions, claimant was terminated for failure to abide with company policy. The Board held that the employer may have had good reason for dismissal but claimant's conduct fell short of misconduct. With this rationale I agree. Relatively minor incident.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
dereliction of duty |
|
|
Summary:
After having been warned on 2 previous occasions, claimant was terminated for failure to abide with company policy. The Board held that the employer may have had good reason for dismissal but claimant's conduct fell short of misconduct. With this rationale I agree. Relatively minor incident.
