Decision 26926
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 26926 | Urie | English | 1995-02-07 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| misconduct | improper language |
Summary:
Claimant had a verbal altercation at time of discharge and had had 2 previous warnings for such altercations with other employees. That is misconduct. Provocation due to the other employee does not detract from the reasonable inference that there was misconduct wilfully entered into by claimant.