Decision 26828
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 26828 | Flanigan | English | 1995-01-31 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | awards | nature of monies |
Summary:
The settlement makes no explanation as to what the monies were for. Claimant argues that the reason for this is that the Ontario Human Rights Commission would not want to have it in print that it was compensation in the form of damages for a breach on its part of the Act which it was to enforce.