| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
decision not received |
|
Summary:
Claimant's contention that he did not receive the notices until 1-8 and the evidence submitted in support were clearly relevant considerations which the CEIC failed to take into account. This constituted an improper exercise of its discretion. The Board did not exceed its jurisdiction.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
discretion of Commission |
time for appeal to bor |
Summary:
Claimant's contention that he did not receive the notices until 1-8, and the evidence submitted in support, were clearly relevant considerations which the CEIC failed to take into account. This constituted an improper exercise of its discretion. The Board did not exceed its jurisdiction.
