Decision 26446
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 26446 | Joyal | French | 1995-01-03 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| misconduct | incompetence |
Summary:
Nothing indicates that the claimant acted maliciously, intentionnaly or deliberately. She perhaps did not have, or no longer had, the skills required for her job. The negligence was not deliberate; what was involved was incompetence rather than deliberate misconduct.