| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| courses of instruction or training |
referral |
duration |
|
Summary:
Benefit period ended 11-1-92. Course started 13-1-92. Claimant argued that an information session held on 7-1-92 was an integral part of the course. Even if the session was compulsory, there was evidence from the learning institution itself that it was not an integral part of the course.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
constitution of board |
change of members |
|
Summary:
Since the first Board which was seized of the matter simply adjourned it to be resumed after getting certain information from the Commission, it ought to have been composed of the same personnel which heard the initial evidence. That it did not do so is fatal to the validity of the decision.
