Decision 26220
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 26220 | Bourgeois | English | 1994-12-02 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| basic concepts | benefit periods | extension | out of canada |
Summary:
The claimant's absence from Canada and the resulting disentitlement does not qualify him for an extension to the benefit period. His benefit period covers 52 consecutive weeks and these benefits cannot be deferred to a later period after the benefit period terminates.