Decision 26057
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 26057 | Gibson | English | 1994-11-23 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| penalties | proof | need for an explanation | weight |
Summary:
In finding that it was not totally convinced by claimant's explanation and that the explanation was sufficiently reasonable to warrant a reduction of the penalty, the Board in fact concluded that there was a likelihood that the explanation was true. It should have allowed the case (CUB 18063).
- Date modified: